Enhancing Orthopaedic Residents’ Microsurgery Suturing Skills Using a Low-Fidelity Setup
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective. To describe the suturing consistency of orthopaedic residents in microsurgery using a low-fidelity set-up.
Background. Residents lack the time and resources to practice microsurgical suturing under a microscope before being exposed to live surgeries. Speedy and consistent suturing are critical skills during live surgery (e.g., vessel anastomosis in free flap surgery, or critical revascularization). This study presents a budget-friendly home or office setup for microsurgery practice to improve the consistency of suture distance and interval.
Methodology. This is a cross-sectional study that measured the consistency of suture distances and intervals and time to completion of seven Orthopaedic residents using a locally available digital USB-powered microscope, a monitor, and latex sheets. Consistency was analyzed using intraclass correlation.
Results. All residents had a faster time to completion with each attempt (mean 1st attempt = 27.7 min, 2nd attempt = 20.4 min, 3rd attempt = 17 min). The third attempt showed significantly improved suture consistency in all participants (ICC = 0.50, p<0.001).
Conclusion. This budget-friendly home or office set-up for microsurgery practice improves time to completion and consistency in suture intervals when suturing under magnification.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Vinagre G, Villa J, Amillo S. Microsurgery training: does it improve surgical skills? J Hand Microsurg. 2017;9(1): 47–8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28442865 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5403728. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1599222
Yap LH, Butler CE. Principles of microsurgery. In: Thorne CHM. Grabb and Smith's plastic surgery. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.
Mohammad S, Hanstein R, Lo Y, Levy IM. Validating a low-fidelity model for microsurgical anastomosis training. JB JS Open Access. 2021;6(3): e20.00148. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34291182 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8291355 https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.20.00148
Ko JW, Lorzano A, Mirarchi AJ. Effectiveness of a microvascular surgery training curriculum for orthopaedic surgery residents. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(11): 950–5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26041858 https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.N.00854
Sayadi LR, Fligor JE, Couchois S, Evans GRD, Widgerow A, Lanier B. A novel application of digital microscope for microsurgery training. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2021;1:9-18. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1710346.
Chai A, Crank S, Mizen K, Philip J. Low-cost model using a digital microscope for learning, practicing, and maintaining microvascular surgical skills. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021;59(2): 247–8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33160731 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7438998 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.08.077