Enhancing Orthopaedic Residents’ Microsurgery Suturing Skills Using a Low-Fidelity Setup

Main Article Content

Gabriel Antonio A. Escueta, MD
Raymar L. Sibonga, MD
Joaquin C. Pandanan, MD

Abstract

Objective. To describe the suturing consistency of orthopaedic residents in microsurgery using a low-fidelity set-up. 


Background. Residents lack the time and resources to practice microsurgical suturing under a microscope before being exposed to live surgeries. Speedy and consistent suturing are critical skills during live surgery (e.g., vessel anastomosis in free flap surgery, or critical revascularization). This study presents a budget-friendly home or office setup for microsurgery practice to improve the consistency of suture distance and interval.


Methodology. This is a cross-sectional study that measured the consistency of suture distances and intervals and time to completion of seven Orthopaedic residents using a locally available digital USB-powered microscope, a monitor, and latex sheets. Consistency was analyzed using intraclass correlation.


Results. All residents had a faster time to completion with each attempt (mean 1st attempt = 27.7 min, 2nd attempt = 20.4 min, 3rd attempt = 17 min). The third attempt showed significantly improved suture consistency in all participants (ICC = 0.50, p<0.001).


Conclusion. This budget-friendly home or office set-up for microsurgery practice improves time to completion and consistency in suture intervals when suturing under magnification.

Article Details

How to Cite
Escueta, G. A., Sibonga, R., & Pandanan, J. (2023). Enhancing Orthopaedic Residents’ Microsurgery Suturing Skills Using a Low-Fidelity Setup. Philippine Journal of Orthopaedics, 38(1), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.69472/poai.2023.04
Section
Original Articles

References

Vinagre G, Villa J, Amillo S. Microsurgery training: does it improve surgical skills? J Hand Microsurg. 2017;9(1): 47–8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28442865 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5403728. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1599222

Yap LH, Butler CE. Principles of microsurgery. In: Thorne CHM. Grabb and Smith's plastic surgery. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.

Mohammad S, Hanstein R, Lo Y, Levy IM. Validating a low-fidelity model for microsurgical anastomosis training. JB JS Open Access. 2021;6(3): e20.00148. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34291182 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8291355 https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.20.00148

Ko JW, Lorzano A, Mirarchi AJ. Effectiveness of a microvascular surgery training curriculum for orthopaedic surgery residents. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(11): 950–5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26041858 https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.N.00854

Sayadi LR, Fligor JE, Couchois S, Evans GRD, Widgerow A, Lanier B. A novel application of digital microscope for microsurgery training. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2021;1:9-18. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1710346.

Chai A, Crank S, Mizen K, Philip J. Low-cost model using a digital microscope for learning, practicing, and maintaining microvascular surgical skills. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021;59(2): 247–8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33160731 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7438998 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.08.077