The Hand Pose Estimation Model in Measuring Range of Motion

Main Article Content

Josephine E. Mina, MD
Nathaniel S. Orillaza Jr., MD
Jose Lorenzo C. Capistrano
Prospero C. Naval Jr., PhD

Abstract

Objective. The COVID pandemic has challenged medical practitioners to perform clinical examinations remotely, including assessing the range of motion of the finger joints. This sparked the development of the 3D (three-dimensional) Hand Pose Estimation Model, a software that can generate hand pose estimates and compute hand
joint angles from a 2D (two-dimensional) image. The study aims to assess the accuracy of the 3D Hand Pose Estimation Model when compared with a goniometer and radiography.


Methodology. The 3D Hand Pose Estimation Model was developed by training a machine learning model with a parametric hand model and 2D hand images. Ten healthy participants with no history of trauma, disease, or deformity of the hand were enrolled in the study. Active flexion and extension joint angles of the metacarpophalangeal, proximal interphalangeal, and distal interphalangeal joints of the fingers, excluding the thumb, were measured using the 3D Hand Pose Estimation Model, a goniometer, and radiographs.


Results. The mean joint angles derived from the 3D Hand Pose Estimation Model and goniometer were not significantly different in 18 out of 24 joint angles (75%). While measurements from both instruments differed greatly from those taken on radiographs, more goniometric measurements are within five degrees of the radiographic measurements.


Conclusion. The 3D Hand Pose Estimation Model can estimate joint angles given a 2D image. Improvements in the model can be made with the aid of the data obtained from this study.

Article Details

How to Cite
Mina, J., Orillaza Jr, N., Capistrano, J. L., & Naval Jr., P. (2023). The Hand Pose Estimation Model in Measuring Range of Motion. Philippine Journal of Orthopaedics, 38(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.69472/poai.2023.02
Section
Original Articles
Author Biographies

Josephine E. Mina, MD, University of the Philippines-Philippine General Hospital

Department of Orthopedics, University of the Philippines-Philippine General Hospital

University of the Philippines Manila Surgical Innovations and Biotechnology Laboratory

 

Nathaniel S. Orillaza Jr., MD, University of the Philippines-Philippine General Hospital

Department of Orthopedics, University of the Philippines-Philippine General Hospital

University of the Philippines Manila

University of the Philippines Manila Surgical Innovations and Biotechnology Laboratory

Jose Lorenzo C. Capistrano, University of the Philippines Diliman

University of the Philippines Manila Surgical Innovations and Biotechnology Laboratory

Prospero C. Naval Jr., PhD, Computer Vision and Machine Intelligence Group, Quezon City, Philippines

University of the Philippines Diliman
University of the Philippines Manila Surgical Innovations and Biotechnology Laboratory

References

Groth GN, VanDeven KM, Phillips EC, Ehretsman RL. Goniometry of the proximal and distal interphalangeal joints, part II: placement preferences, interrater reliability, and concurrent validity. J Hand Ther. 2001;14(1): 23-9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11243555 https://doi.org/10.1016/s0894-1130(01)80021-1

Carter TI, Pansy B, Wolff AL, et al. Accuracy and reliability of three different techniques for manual goniometry for wrist motion: a cadaveric study. J Hand Surg Am. 2009;34(8): 1422-8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19703734 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.06.002

McVeigh K, Murray P, Heckman M, Peterson J. Comparison of the validity of goniometer and visual assessments of angular joint positions of the hand and wrist. J Hand Ther. 2016;29(3): 374-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2014.08.025

Ellis B, Bruton A. A study to compare the reliability of composite finger flexion with goniometry for measurement of range of motion in the hand. Clin Rehabil. 2002;16(5): 562-70. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12194627 https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215502cr513oa

Dipietro L, Sabatini AM, Dario P. Evaluation of an instrumented glove for hand-movement acquisition. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2003;40(2): 179-89. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15077642

Gutierréz-Martinez J, Ortiz-Espinosa A, Hernández-Rodríguez PR, Núñez-Gaona-Gaona MA. System to measure the range of motion of the joints of the human hand. Res Invest Clin. 2014;66(Suppl 1): S122-30. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25264792

Nest DSV, Ilyas AM, Rivlin M. Telemedicine evaluation and techniques in hand surgery. J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2020;2(4): 240-5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32835184 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7264028 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsg.2020.05.006

Meals CG, Saunders RJ, Desale S, Means KR. Viability of hand and wrist photogoniometry. Hand (NY). 2018;13(3): 301-4. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28391753 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5987967 https://doi.org/10.1177/1558944717702471

Reissner L, Fischer G, List R, Taylor WR, Giovanoli P, Calcagni M. Minimal detectable difference of the finger and wrist range of motion: comparison of goniometry and 3D motion analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019;14(1): 173. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31182129 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6558857 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1177-y

Lim GM, Jatesiktat P, Kuah CWK, Ang WT. Camera-based hand tracking using a mirror-based multi-view setup. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2020; 2020: 5789-93. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33019290 https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC44109.2020.9176728

Zhao JZ, Blazar PE, Mora AN, Earp BE. Range of motion measurements of the fingers via smartphone photography. Hand (NY). 2020;15(5): 679-85.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30688093 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7543212 https://doi.org/10.1177/1558944718820955