Early Outcomes of Ponseti Treatment for Idiopathic and Non-Idiopathic Clubfoot at a Philippine Tertiary Government Hospital

Main Article Content

Kyle Paolo DG. Iddoba, MD
https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0649-2031
Jian Martin M. Josue, MD, FPOA
Mel Jann U. De Vera, MD, FPOA
https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7328-7278
Antonio Nicanor B. Suero, MD, FPOA
Isagani E. Garin, MD, FPOA
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0468-373X
Diana C. Bandong, MD, FPOA
https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1179-3585

Abstract

Background. The Ponseti method achieves less predictable outcomes and higher workloads in rigid non-idiopathic clubfoot compared to idiopathic cohorts. Structural and socioeconomic barriers further complicate management in low- and middle-income countries.


Objective. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the early outcomes of Ponseti treatment for both idiopathic and non-idiopathic clubfoot in a Philippine tertiary government hospital setting.


Methodology. This retrospective chart review (August 2019 to December 2023) evaluated early Ponseti outcomes at BGHMC. Through total enumeration, 42 eligible patients aged ≤ 2 years (36 idiopathic, 6 non-idiopathic) were analyzed. Initial clinical success was defined as achieving an initial plantigrade foot (Pirani score ≤ 0.5), allowing transition into a minimum of six months of maintenance bracing.


Results. Baseline severity was high across both cohorts (median Pirani 5.5 idiopathic vs. 6.0 non-idiopathic). The early clinical success rate was 100%, enabling all feet to complete initial casting and transition into bracing with 100% full short-term brace compliance documented at six months. Univariate linear regression demonstrated that a non-idiopathic etiology was a strong predictor of an increased casting workload (B = 2.085, 95% CI [0.56, 3.61], p = 0.008), requiring approximately two additional casts. Etiology did not significantly predict baseline severity, pre-tenotomy casting duration, or percutaneous Achilles tenotomy rates, which were uncommonly low (~36% for both groups). Early deformity recurrence within the limited follow-up period (maximum 13 months) occurred exclusively in idiopathic feet (12.07%).


Conclusion. The Ponseti method achieves favorable initial clinical correction and short-term brace compliance during early maintenance across both cohorts. However, conclusions are strictly limited by a small non-idiopathic sample size and a short follow-up duration. Given an uncommonly low institutional tenotomy rate (~36%) that deviates from global benchmarks, this cohort faces a high risk for late, weight-bearing relapses and requires strict longitudinal surveillance up to at least age 5 years.

Article Details

How to Cite
Iddoba, K. P., Josue, J. M., De Vera, M. J., Suero, A. N., Garin, I., & BANDONG, D. (2026). Early Outcomes of Ponseti Treatment for Idiopathic and Non-Idiopathic Clubfoot at a Philippine Tertiary Government Hospital. Philippine Journal of Orthopaedics, 41(3). https://doi.org/10.69472/poai.2026.17939
Section
Original Articles
Author Biographies

Kyle Paolo DG. Iddoba, MD, Baguio General Hospital and Medical Center, Benguet, Philippines

Department of Orthopedics, Baguio General Hospital and Medical Center, Benguet, Philippines

 

Jian Martin M. Josue, MD, FPOA, Baguio General Hospital and Medical Center, Benguet, Philippines

Department of Orthopedics, Baguio General Hospital and Medical Center, Benguet, Philippines

Mel Jann U. De Vera, MD, FPOA, Baguio General Hospital and Medical Center, Benguet, Philippines

Department of Orthopedics, Baguio General Hospital and Medical Center, Benguet, Philippines

Antonio Nicanor B. Suero, MD, FPOA, Baguio General Hospital and Medical Center, Benguet, Philippines

 Department of Orthopedics, Baguio General Hospital and Medical Center, Benguet, Philippines

Isagani E. Garin, MD, FPOA, Baguio General Hospital and Medical Center, Benguet, Philippines

Department of Orthopedics, Baguio General Hospital and Medical Center, Benguet, Philippines

 

Diana C. Bandong, MD, FPOA, Baguio General Hospital and Medical Center, Benguet, Philippines

Department of Orthopedics, Baguio General Hospital and Medical Center, Benguet, Philippines

References

1. Penny N, Aroojis A, Mehtani A, Banskota B. Clubfoot correction in walking-age children: a review. J Foot Ankle Surg (Asia Pac). 2021;8(3):102-9. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10040-1166 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10040-1166

2. Cady R, Hennessey TA, Schwend RM. Diagnosis and treatment of idiopathic congenital clubfoot. Pediatrics. 2022;149(2):e2021055555. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35104362 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9645716 https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2021-055555 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2021-055555

3. Beck AE, McMillin MJ, Gildersleeve HI, Shively KM, Tang A, Bamshad MJ. Genotype-phenotype relationships in Freeman-Sheldon syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. 2014;164A(11):2808-13. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih/gov25256237 https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.36762 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.36762

4. Rastogi A, Agarwal A. Long-term outcomes of the Ponseti method for treatment of clubfoot: a systematic review. Int Orthop. 2021;45(10):2599-608. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34415418 Dhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-021-05189-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-021-05189-w

5. Abraham J, Wall JC Jr, Diab M, Beaver C. Ponseti casting vs. soft tissue release for the initial treatment of non-idiopathic clubfoot. Front Surg. 2021;8:668334. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34124137 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8192715 https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.668334 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.668334

6. Zionts LE, Ebramzadeh E, Sangiorgio SN. Objective analysis of intermediate-term outcome of the Ponseti technique: a review of the experience from Los Angeles. Ann Transl Med. 2021;9(13):1101. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34423013 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8339808 https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-7774 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-7774

7. De Mulder T, Prinsen S, Van Campenhout A. Treatment of non-idiopathic clubfeet with the Ponseti method: a systematic review. J Child Orthop. 2018;12(6):575-81. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30607204 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6293335 https://doi.org/10.1302/1863-2548.12.180066 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/1863-2548.12.180066

8. Shah IP, Crawford AH, Tamai J, Parikh SN. Management of non-idiopathic clubfeet. Int J Pediatr Orthop. 2016;2(1):27-32.

9. Eusebio IDD, Sumpaico CEJ. Results of Ponseti casting for clubfoot in a tertiary public hospital. Acta Med Philipp. 2021;55(3). https://doi.org/10.47895/amp.v55i3.1774 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47895/amp.v55i3.1774

10. Johnson RR, Friedman JM, Becker AM, Spiegel DA. The Ponseti method for clubfoot treatment in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review of barriers and solutions to service delivery. J Pediatr Orthop. 2017;37(2):e134-9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26919713 https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000000723 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000000723

11. Syed JG, Khan MA, Chinoy MA, Pigeolet M. Percutaneous Achilles tendon tenotomy in clubfoot patients with a 22 gauge needle in a low-resource setting. Trop Doct. 2023;53(3):378-80. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37116889 https://doi.org/10.1177/00494755221146343 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00494755221146343

12. Pirani S, Hodges D, Sekeramayi F. A reliable and valid method of assessing the amount of deformity in the congenital clubfoot deformity. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90(Suppl I):53.

13. Alomran AK, Bubshait DA, Alzahrani BA, Almazrua AA, Alyaqout MA. Is Ponseti casting effective in neuromuscular clubfoot? A university hospital experience from Eastern Province in Saudi Arabia. J Musculoskelet Surg Res. 2020;4(1):31-6. https://doi.org/10.4103/jmsr.jmsr_73_19 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jmsr.jmsr_73_19

14. Butt MN, Perveen W, Ciongradi CI, et al. Outcomes of the Ponseti technique in different types of clubfoot—a single center retrospective analysis. Children (Basel). 2023;10(8):1340. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37628341 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10453163 https://doi.org/10.3390/children10081340 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/children10081340

15. Pulak S, Swamy M. Treatment of idiopathic clubfoot by Ponseti technique of manipulation and serial plaster casting and its critical evaluation. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2012;22(2):77-84. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22876070 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3407829

16. Morcuende JA, Dolan LA, Dietz FR, Ponseti IV. Radical reduction in the rate of extensive corrective surgery for clubfoot using the Ponseti method. Pediatrics. 2004;113(2):376-80. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14754952 https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.113.2.376 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.113.2.376

17. Radler C. The Ponseti method for the treatment of congenital club foot: review of the current literature and treatment recommendations. Int Orthop. 2013;37(9):1747-53. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23928728 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3764299 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2031-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2031-1

18. Ogutu V, Jacob EE, Vahwere BM, et al. Global prevalence, patterns, and predictors of relapse following Ponseti treatment for idiopathic clubfoot: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2026;27:636. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42210224 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13420858 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-026-10017-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-026-10017-6

19. Shah A, Aroojis A, Mehta R. The Ponseti method of treatment for neuromuscular and syndromic (non-idiopathic) clubfeet: evaluation of a programme-based approach at a mean follow-up of 5.8 years. Int Orthop. 2021;45(1):155-63. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32651710 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04677-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04677-9

20. Hanumanthappa M, Prabhakar PH, Rangaraj P, Kulkarni MG, Vaibhava. A prospective study of the clinical outcome of deformity correction by Ponseti technique in idiopathic clubfoot. J Contemp Clin Pract. 2025;11(8):299-307. https://doi.org/10.61336/jccp/25-08-43