A Prospective Quasi-Randomized Comparative Study between Intra-Articular Platelet-Rich Plasma and Corticosteroid Injection in Mild to Moderate Knee Osteoarthritis in Patients Aged 40–60 Years Evaluation of Pain and Functional Outcomes

Main Article Content

Chirag V. Thakkar
https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9445-9356
Bhumil C. Rathod Jr.
https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3136-6956
Mit A. Patel
https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2716-4171
Harmesh B. Rabari
https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0142-6852
Sunny K. Patel Sr.
https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1444-7611

Abstract

Background. Knee osteoarthritis is a prevalent degenerative condition that leads to chronic pain, stiffness, and reduced joint function. While corticosteroid (CS) injections are commonly used for rapid relief of symptoms, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has gained attention as a regenerative treatment with potential longer-lasting effects.


Objective. To evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes of intra-articular PRP and corticosteroid injections in patients with early-stage knee osteoarthritis.


Methodology. A prospective quasi-randomized comparative study was conducted on 84 patients diagnosed with Kellgren-Lawrence grade 1, 2, and 3 knee osteoarthritis. Participants were allocated into two groups: one receiving a PRP injection and the other receiving a corticosteroid injection.  Primary outcomes included pain reduction and functional improvement assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) at baseline, one week, six weeks, three months, and six months. A p-value of <0.001 was considered statistically significant.


Result. Both treatment groups demonstrated improvement in pain and functional scores following intervention. The corticosteroid group showed more pronounced improvement during the early follow-up period. However, the PRP group exhibited greater and more sustained improvement at later follow-ups, particularly at three and six months, with better overall clinical outcomes.


Conclusion. Corticosteroid injections are effective for immediate relief of symptoms, whereas PRP provides longer-lasting benefits in terms of pain reduction and functional improvement. PRP may therefore be a preferable option for long-term management in patients with mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis.

Article Details

How to Cite
Thakkar, C., Rathod, B., Patel, M., Rabari, H., & Patel, S. (2026). A Prospective Quasi-Randomized Comparative Study between Intra-Articular Platelet-Rich Plasma and Corticosteroid Injection in Mild to Moderate Knee Osteoarthritis in Patients Aged 40–60 Years: Evaluation of Pain and Functional Outcomes. Philippine Journal of Orthopaedics, 41(3). https://doi.org/10.69472/poai.2026.17795
Section
Original Articles
Author Biographies

Chirag V. Thakkar, Gujarat Medical Education and Research Society (GMERS) Medical College and General Hospital, Gotri, Vadodara, Gujarat, India

Department of Orthopaedics, Gujarat Medical Education and Research Society (GMERS) Medical College and General Hospital, Gotri, Vadodara, Gujarat, India

Bhumil C. Rathod Jr., Gujarat Medical Education and Research Society (GMERS) Medical College and General Hospital, Gotri, Vadodara, Gujarat, India

Department of Orthopaedics, Gujarat Medical Education and Research Society (GMERS) Medical College and General Hospital, Gotri, Vadodara, Gujarat, India

Mit A. Patel, Gujarat Medical Education and Research Society (GMERS) Medical College and General Hospital, Gotri, Vadodara, Gujarat, India

Department of Orthopaedics, Gujarat Medical Education and Research Society (GMERS) Medical College and General Hospital, Gotri, Vadodara, Gujarat, India

Harmesh B. Rabari, Gujarat Medical Education and Research Society (GMERS) Medical College and General Hospital, Gotri, Vadodara, Gujarat, India

Department of Orthopaedics, Gujarat Medical Education and Research Society (GMERS) Medical College and General Hospital, Gotri, Vadodara, Gujarat, India

Sunny K. Patel Sr., Gujarat Medical Education and Research Society (GMERS) Medical College and General Hospital, Gotri, Vadodara, Gujarat, India

Department of Orthopaedics, Gujarat Medical Education and Research Society (GMERS) Medical College and General Hospital, Gotri, Vadodara, Gujarat, India

References

1. Hunter DJ, Bierma-Zeinstra S. Osteoarthritis. Lancet. 2019;393(10182):1745-59. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31034380 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30417-9

2. GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1204-22. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33069326 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7567026 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9

3. Kolasinski SL, Neogi T, Hochberg MC, et al. 2019 American College of Rheumatology/Arthritis Foundation guideline for the management of osteoarthritis of the hand, hip, and knee. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020;72(2):149-62. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31908149 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11488261 https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.24131

4. van den Bosch MHJ. Osteoarthritis year in review 2020: biology. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2021;29(2):143-50. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33242602 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2020.10.006

5. Katz JN, Arant KR, Loeser RF. Diagnosis and treatment of hip and knee osteoarthritis: a review. JAMA. 2021;325(6):568-78. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33560326 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8225295 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.22171

6. Bannuru RR, Osani MC, Vaysbrot EE, et al. OARSI guidelines for the non-surgical management of knee, hip, and polyarticular osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2019;27(11):1578-89. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31278997 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2019.06.011

7. Bensa A, Sangiorgio A, Boffa A, Salerno M, Moraca G, Filardo G. Corticosteroid injections for knee osteoarthritis offer clinical benefits similar to hyaluronic acid and lower than platelet-rich plasma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EFORT Open Rev. 2024;9(9):883-95. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39222336 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11457815 https://doi.org/10.1530/EOR-23-0198

8. Xiong Y, Gong C, Peng X, et al. Efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma injections for the treatment of osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023;10:1204144. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37441691 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10333515 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1204144

9. Dai WL, Zhou AG, Zhang H, Zhang J. Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy. 2017;33(3):659-70.e1. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28012636 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2016.09.024

10. Costa LAV, Lenza M, Irrgang JJ, Fu FH, Ferretti M. How does platelet-rich plasma compare clinically to other therapies in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2023;51(4):1074-86. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35316112 https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465211062243

11. Miller MD, Thompson SR. Meniscal injuries of the knee. In: Azar FM, Beaty JH, Canale ST, eds. Campbell’s Operative Orthopaedics, 13th ed. Elsevier; 2017.

12. Court-Brown CM, Heckman JD, McQueen MM, Ricci WM, Tornetta P III, McKee MD, eds. Rockwood and Green’s Fractures in Adults, 8th ed. Wolters Kluwer Health; 2015.

13. Hurley WL, Denegar C, Buckley WE. The relationship between grading and instrumented measurements of anterior knee joint laxity. J Sport Rehabil. 2008;17(1):60-7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18270387 https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.17.1.60

14. Oeding JF, Varady NH, Fearington FW, et al. Platelet-rich plasma versus alternative injections for osteoarthritis of the knee: a systematic review and statistical fragility index-based meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Sports Med. 2024;52(12):3147-60. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38420745 https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465231224463

15. Qiao X, Yan L, Feng Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of corticosteroids, hyaluronic acid, and PRP and combination therapy for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023;24(1):926. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38037038 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10687893 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06925-6

16. Bannuru RR, Schmid CH, Kent DM, Vaysbrot EE, Wong JB, McAlindon TE. Comparative effectiveness of pharmacologic interventions for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(1):46-54. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25560713 https://doi.org/10.7326/M14-1231

17. Pojala CV, Toma S, Costache C, et al. The potential of intra-articular therapies in managing knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Clin Pract. 2024;14(5):1970-96. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39451872 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11506573 https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract14050157

18. Pelluri R, Sridevi B, Guntupalli C, et al. Effect of platelet-rich plasma versus placebo or corticosteroid for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2024;62:102870. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39882511 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11772150 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102870