Non-Invasive Removal of Tethered Surgical Drains Using Kirschner Wire with Ultrasound Guidance An In-Vitro Experimental Study

Main Article Content

Vanea U. Lim, MD, DPBO
https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9812-9583
Ser Anthony Si, MD FPOA
Carlo Alvarez, MD

Abstract

Background. Surgical drain retention is rare but can cause significant consequences if not addressed promptly. Few studies have investigated non-invasive methods to remove tethered drains. This study aimed to determine whether tethered drains could be removed using a Kirschner wire under ultrasound guidance.


Methodology. The study was an experimental in-vitro study on pork loin specimens. Drain tubes (No. 10, No. 15) were placed subfascially with one suture stitch passing through the lumen of the drain tube (Vicryl 2-0, Vicryl 1-0). An ultrasound machine (Sonosite M Turbo) was used to locate the area of tethering. Kirschner wires (1.6 mm and 2.0 mm, threaded and smooth) were inserted and thrust multiple times intraluminally to cut the suture. There were eight possible combinations of wire type, drain diameter, and suture size with seven replicates per combination. Ultrasound accuracy was set at 0.5 cm from the tethering site, and durations were recorded with a cut-off value of five minutes.


Results. Ultrasound was able to locate the tethered site in 47 out of 56 attempts (83.93%). Most attempts (48 out of 56, 85.71%) were successful in cutting the tethered suture and removing the drain. The overall duration for drain removal was 1’35”. Shorter durations were recorded for threaded compared to smooth Kirschner wires (1’34” vs 1’37”), for size No. 10 compared to No. 15 drains (1’20” vs 1’50”), and for Vicryl 2-0 compared to Vicryl 1-0 sutures (1’25” vs 1’45”).


Conclusion. Using ultrasound to locate the area of tethering and using Kirshner wire intraluminally was an effective non-invasive way to remove tethered drains in pork loin specimens. This combined method can simplify drain removal and can be used as a first-line option before open removal.

Article Details

How to Cite
Lim, V., Si, S. A., & Alvarez, C. (2024). Non-Invasive Removal of Tethered Surgical Drains Using Kirschner Wire with Ultrasound Guidance: An In-Vitro Experimental Study. Philippine Journal of Orthopaedics, 40(1), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.69472/poai.2025.10
Section
Original Articles
Author Biography

Ser Anthony Si, MD FPOA, Philippine Orthopedic Center

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Philippine Orthopedic Center

References

Parker MJ, Livingstone V, Clifton R, McKee A. Closed suction surgical wound drainage after orthopaedic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;2007(3):CD001825. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17636687 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8408575 https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001825.pub2

Koaban S, Alatassi R, Alogayyel N. A forgotten retained drain inside a knee for 10 years: a case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2018;48:83-86. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29883921 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6041116 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2018.05.014

Jaafar S, Vigdorchik J, Markel DC. Drain technique in elective total joint arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2014;37(1):37-9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24683648 https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20131219-05

Gaines RJ, Dunbar RP. The use of surgical drains in orthopedics. Orthopedics. 2008;31(7):702–5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18705564 https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20110505-06

Chen ZY, Gao Y, Chen W, Li X, Zhang YZ. Is wound drainage necessary in hip arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014;24(6):939-46. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23917702 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-013-1284-0

Ho SW, Chua IT. A rare case of a blood clot masquerading as a retained surgical drain. Ann Transl Med. 2016;4(23):463. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28090519 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5220031 https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2016.12.22

Laratta JL, Lombardi JM, Shillingford JN, et al. Optimal management of tethered surgical drains: a cadaver study. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019;27(4):129-35. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30247306 https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-17-00122

Namyslowski J, Halin NJ, Greenfield AJ. Percutaneous retrieval of a retained Jackson-Pratt drain fragment. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1996;19(6):446-8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8994715 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02577637

Rue JP, Johnson CA. Technique for removal of snared silicone drains. Orthopedics. 2000;23(6):543–5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10875413 https://doi.org/10.3928/0147-7447-20000601-10

Lazarides S, Hussain A, Zafiropoulous G. Removal of surgically entangled drain: a new original nonoperative technique. Int J Curr Med Sci Pract. 2003;10:63–4.

Li H, Du Y, Wu J, et al. The use of ultrasound to locate a tethered surgical drain: a novel way to achieve fast removal. BMC Surgery. 2020;20(1):264. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33129303 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7603670 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-020-00929-y

Arifin WN, Zahiruddin WM. Sample size calculation in animal studies using resource equation approach. Malays J Med Sci. 2017;24(5):101-5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29386977 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5772820 https://doi.org/10.21315/mjms2017.24.5.11

Hess SR, Satpathy J, Waligora AC, Ugwu-Oju O. Minimally invasive surgical technique for tethered surgical drains. Indian J Orthop. 2017;51(2):213-6. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28400669 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5361474 https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.201708